benchmarks/web-search/linkup vs firecrawl
web search API · three tasks · 2026

Linkup vs Firecrawl: web search API comparison

Linkup and Firecrawl measured on the same three jobs: factual lookup, hard retrieval for coding agents, and multi-hop company search. Winner per task is in the table below.

Linkup or Firecrawl — winner per task

Best measured endpoint per vendor on each task. Modes stay separate rows in the tables below.

TaskLinkupFirecrawlMeasured winner
Factual lookup (accuracy)96.7%95.3%Linkup
Hard retrieval (task completion, search+fetch)48.3%76.0%Firecrawl
Multi-hop (F1, search-only)42.0%28.7%Linkup

Linkup and Firecrawl on company-news lookup

One query, one verifiable fact. 300 questions, max 10 results. Full factual lookup board →

AxisLinkupFirecrawlMeasured winner
Accuracy (extracted-answer)96.7%95.3%Linkup
Answer recall (AR@5)94.7%96.7%Firecrawl
Speed (mean latency)1.57s510msFirecrawl
Cost per 1,000 queries (list price)$5.00$5.00tie
Linkup vs Firecrawl factual lookup endpoints
RankVendorEndpoint & configuration$ / 1k correctAccuracyAR@1AR@5LatencySnippet tokensTotal $Official docsCost per 1,000 queries
1Linkupweb searchPOST /v1/searchdepth=fast · outputType=searchResults$5.1796.7%79.0%94.7%1.57s3,022$1.50Official docs$5 / 1kdepth=fast · searchResults
2Firecrawlweb searchPOST /v2/search$5.2495.3%77.7%96.7%510ms678$1.50Official docs$5 / 1k2 credits / 10 results
3Linkupweb searchPOST /v1/searchdepth=standard · outputType=searchResults$5.4392.0%67.3%90.3%2.55s2,983$1.50Official docs$5 / 1kdepth=standard · searchResults

$ / 1k correct is $ / 1k queries divided by extracted-answer accuracy. Ranked by $ / 1k correct. Cost per 1,000 queries is the published PAYG list price, linked to the vendor pricing page. Not promotional packs or volume discounts. TinyFish Search is free with a 30 requests/min cap — $0 is not unlimited throughput.

Linkup and Firecrawl on coding-agent docs

Grounded task completion on 100 documentation tickets. A pass needs a # source: URL from that run. Full coding-agent board →

Firecrawl leads at 76.0%. Median task time: Linkup 48s vs Firecrawl 34s.

[03.a]search & fetch
Linkup vs Firecrawl search & fetch coding-agent board
RankVendorEndpoint & configurationTask completionMedian task timeMedian task costAvg search timeMedian task tokensAPI list price
1Linkup standardPOST /v1/search depth=standardPOST /v1/fetch mode=standard48.3 ± 4.948s$0.147$0.038 search+fetch$0.108 token cost2.00s57,791$0.005 / search$0.005 / fetch
2FirecrawlPOST /v2/searchPOST /v2/scrape76.0 ± 1.034s$0.082$0.028 search+fetch$0.055 token cost2.81s17,379$0.005 / search$0.0025 / fetch
[03.b]search only
Linkup vs Firecrawl search-only coding-agent board
RankVendorEndpoint & configurationTask completionMedian task timeMedian task costAvg search timeMedian task tokensAPI list price
1Linkup fastPOST /v1/search depth=fast43.3 ± 1.127s$0.100$0.025 search$0.075 token cost1.39s24,057$0.005 / search
2FirecrawlPOST /v2/search70.3 ± 1.528s$0.059$0.025 search$0.034 token cost2.87s7,456$0.005 / search

Linkup and Firecrawl on multi-turn company search

45 questions, each with three or four constraints. Scored on precision, recall, F1, and exact-set. Full multi-turn board →

Linkup leads F1 at 42.0%. Median agent time: Linkup 63.76s vs Firecrawl 74.01s. Median task cost: Linkup $0.923 vs Firecrawl $0.265.

[04.a]search only
Linkup vs Firecrawl search-only multi-turn board
ProviderEndpoint & configurationF1PrecisionRecallExact setMedian timeMean turnsMedian task costAPI list price
Linkup standardPOST /v1/search depth=standardlinkup-standard42.0 ± 2.185.9 ± 7.631.0 ± 2.62.0 ± 3.572.1 s7.3$0.932$0.070 search$0.862 token cost$0.005 / search
Linkup fastPOST /v1/search depth=fastlinkup-fast41.3 ± 1.882.9 ± 0.930.6 ± 1.60.9 ± 1.563.8 s7.4$0.923$0.070 search$0.853 token cost$0.005 / search
FirecrawlPOST /v2/searchfirecrawl28.7 ± 5.168.9 ± 3.719.6 ± 4.21.3 ± 2.174.0 s7.9$0.265$0.070 search$0.196 token cost$0.005 / search

F1, precision, recall, and exact-set accuracy are percentages reported as mean ± sample SD across three independent runs; each run aggregates all 45 questions. SD is measured in percentage points. Median time is the median end-to-end time across all runs for each vendor. Median task cost is the median of LLM $ plus search API $ per agent run. API list price is the PAYG unit rate of the search endpoint the harness calls.

[04.b]search + fetch
Linkup vs Firecrawl search+fetch multi-turn board
ProviderEndpoint & configurationF1PrecisionRecallExact setMedian timeMean turnsMedian task costAPI list price
Linkup standardPOST /v1/search depth=standardlinkup-standard42.1 ± 1.489.9 ± 2.030.6 ± 1.63.0 ± 3.380.5 s7.5$0.927$0.070 search+fetch$0.866 token cost$0.005 / search$0.001 / fetch
Linkup fastPOST /v1/search depth=fastlinkup-fast39.2 ± 1.384.3 ± 4.128.2 ± 1.40.8 ± 1.567.8 s7.4$0.907$0.061 search+fetch$0.839 token cost$0.005 / search$0.001 / fetch
FirecrawlPOST /v2/searchfirecrawl35.8 ± 4.382.2 ± 2.525.4 ± 3.63.0 ± 2.682.1 s7.9$0.291$0.063 search+fetch$0.229 token cost$0.005 / search$0.0025 / fetch

F1, precision, recall, and exact-set accuracy are percentages reported as mean ± sample SD across three independent runs; each run aggregates all 45 questions. SD is measured in percentage points. Median time is the median end-to-end time across all runs for each vendor. Median task cost is the median of LLM $ plus search/fetch API $ per agent run. API list price is the PAYG unit rate of the search (and fetch) endpoint the harness calls.

Linkup vs Firecrawl — common questions

Linkup vs Firecrawl: which web search API is better?

Factual lookup: Linkup leads accuracy (Linkup 96.7% vs Firecrawl 95.3%). Hard retrieval: Firecrawl leads task completion (Linkup 48.3% vs Firecrawl 76.0%). Multi-hop: Linkup leads F1 (Linkup 42.0% vs Firecrawl 28.7%).

Is Linkup or Firecrawl cheaper?

On factual lookup list price: Linkup $5.00 per 1,000 queries vs Firecrawl $5.00 — effectively tied. Coding token efficiency is median task tokens; multi-hop cheapest is cost per agent run. Free tiers and volume discounts excluded.