benchmarks/web-search/exa vs perplexity
web search API · three tasks · 2026

Exa vs Perplexity: web search API comparison

Exa and Perplexity measured on the same three jobs: factual lookup, hard retrieval for coding agents, and multi-hop company search. Winner per task is in the table below.

Exa or Perplexity — winner per task

Best measured endpoint per vendor on each task. Modes stay separate rows in the tables below.

TaskExaPerplexityMeasured winner
Factual lookup (accuracy)99.3%97.3%Exa
Hard retrieval (task completion, search+fetch)83.0%77.7%Exa
Multi-hop (F1, search-only)45.7%37.8%Exa

Exa and Perplexity on company-news lookup

One query, one verifiable fact. 300 questions, max 10 results. Full factual lookup board →

AxisExaPerplexityMeasured winner
Accuracy (extracted-answer)99.3%97.3%Exa
Answer recall (AR@5)99.3%98.3%Exa
Speed (mean latency)398ms1.38sExa
Cost per 1,000 queries (list price)$7.00$5.00Perplexity
Exa vs Perplexity factual lookup endpoints
RankVendorEndpoint & configuration$ / 1k correctAccuracyAR@1AR@5LatencySnippet tokensTotal $Official docsCost per 1,000 queries
1Perplexityweb searchPOST /searchsearch_context_size=low$5.1497.3%91.7%98.3%1.38s476$1.50Official docs$5 / 1kSearch API · POST /search
2Exaweb searchPOST /searchtype=fast$7.0599.3%95.0%99.3%652ms1,987$2.10Official docs$7 / 1ktype=fast · up to 10 results
3Exaweb searchPOST /searchtype=instant$7.1797.7%80.0%97.3%398ms2,128$2.10Official docs$7 / 1ktype=instant · up to 10 results

$ / 1k correct is $ / 1k queries divided by extracted-answer accuracy. Ranked by $ / 1k correct. Cost per 1,000 queries is the published PAYG list price, linked to the vendor pricing page. Not promotional packs or volume discounts. TinyFish Search is free with a 30 requests/min cap — $0 is not unlimited throughput.

Exa and Perplexity on coding-agent docs

Grounded task completion on 100 documentation tickets. A pass needs a # source: URL from that run. Full coding-agent board →

Exa leads at 83.0%. Median task time: Exa 23s vs Perplexity 22s.

[03.a]search & fetch
Exa vs Perplexity search & fetch coding-agent board
RankVendorEndpoint & configurationTask completionMedian task timeMedian task costAvg search timeMedian task tokensAPI list price
1Exa deepPOST /search type=deepPOST /contents83.0 ± 1.037s$0.127$0.057 search+fetch$0.070 token cost3.97s23,660$0.012 / search$0.001 / fetch
2Exa autoPOST /search type=autoPOST /contents81.7 ± 1.123s$0.107$0.032 search+fetch$0.074 token cost1.19s27,433$0.007 / search$0.001 / fetch
3PerplexityPOST /search search_context_size=highPOST /search search_context_size=high77.7 ± 1.522s$0.083$0.025 search+fetch$0.058 token cost991ms20,062$0.005 / search$0.005 / fetch
[03.b]search only
Exa vs Perplexity search-only coding-agent board
RankVendorEndpoint & configurationTask completionMedian task timeMedian task costAvg search timeMedian task tokensAPI list price
1Exa fastPOST /search type=fast66.3 ± 1.520s$0.103$0.035 search$0.068 token cost626ms22,344$0.007 / search
2Exa instantPOST /search type=instant61.3 ± 2.921s$0.105$0.035 search$0.070 token cost447ms22,423$0.007 / search
3PerplexityPOST /search search_context_size=low77.3 ± 2.118s$0.059$0.025 search$0.034 token cost957ms8,765$0.005 / search

Exa and Perplexity on multi-turn company search

45 questions, each with three or four constraints. Scored on precision, recall, F1, and exact-set. Full multi-turn board →

Exa leads F1 at 45.7%. Median agent time: Exa 49.39s vs Perplexity 48.94s. Median task cost: Exa $0.627 vs Perplexity $0.334.

[04.a]search only
Exa vs Perplexity search-only multi-turn board
ProviderEndpoint & configurationF1PrecisionRecallExact setMedian timeMean turnsMedian task costAPI list price
ExaPOST /search type=deepexa-deep45.7 ± 3.082.6 ± 3.734.0 ± 2.31.6 ± 1.489.8 s7.4$0.716$0.156 search$0.552 token cost$0.012 / search
ExaPOST /search type=instantexa-instant43.6 ± 0.681.9 ± 3.432.5 ± 0.93.1 ± 1.349.4 s7.3$0.627$0.091 search$0.532 token cost$0.007 / search
PerplexityPOST /searchsearch_context_size=low37.8 ± 2.179.3 ± 5.726.8 ± 1.42.2 ± 2.248.9 s7.7$0.334$0.070 search$0.264 token cost$0.005 / search

F1, precision, recall, and exact-set accuracy are percentages reported as mean ± sample SD across three independent runs; each run aggregates all 45 questions. SD is measured in percentage points. Median time is the median end-to-end time across all runs for each vendor. Median task cost is the median of LLM $ plus search/fetch API $ per agent run. API list price is the PAYG unit rate of the search (and fetch) endpoint the harness calls.

[04.b]search + fetch
Exa vs Perplexity search+fetch multi-turn board
ProviderEndpoint & configurationF1PrecisionRecallExact setMedian timeMean turnsMedian task costAPI list price
ExaPOST /search type=deepexa-deep47.7 ± 2.489.2 ± 1.635.4 ± 2.51.7 ± 1.995.9 s7.5$0.687$0.156 search+fetch$0.530 token cost$0.012 / search$0.001 / fetch
ExaPOST /search type=instantexa-instant44.3 ± 1.386.0 ± 2.632.9 ± 1.35.2 ± 1.252.7 s7.5$0.651$0.091 search+fetch$0.557 token cost$0.007 / search$0.001 / fetch

F1, precision, recall, and exact-set accuracy are percentages reported as mean ± sample SD across three independent runs; each run aggregates all 45 questions. SD is measured in percentage points. Median time is the median end-to-end time across all runs for each vendor. Median task cost is the median of LLM $ plus search/fetch API $ per agent run. API list price is the PAYG unit rate of the search (and fetch) endpoint the harness calls.

Exa vs Perplexity — common questions

Exa vs Perplexity: which web search API is better?

Factual lookup: Exa leads accuracy (Exa 99.3% vs Perplexity 97.3%). Hard retrieval: Exa leads task completion (Exa 83.0% vs Perplexity 77.7%). Multi-hop: Exa leads F1 (Exa 45.7% vs Perplexity 37.8%).

Is Exa or Perplexity cheaper?

On factual lookup list price: Exa $7.00 per 1,000 queries vs Perplexity $5.00 — Perplexity is cheaper. Coding token efficiency is median task tokens; multi-hop cheapest is cost per agent run. Free tiers and volume discounts excluded.