Exa vs exa-instant
Company funding data, measured head-to-head on the same company cohort: the verdict is split — Exa returns more correct latest stages end to end, while exa-instant is more accurate on the stages it does return. Measured on the funding enrichment board: rounds announced more than 30 days ago. Recent rounds are scored separately on the freshness board. Every stage judged against source-verified funding events; latency and cost measured beside accuracy. Not vendor claims.
Exa or exa-instant — measured winner per axis
| Axis | Exa | exa-instant | Measured winner |
|---|---|---|---|
| Correct latest stage end to end (correct stage yield) | 88.6% | 87.0% | Exa |
| Right when a stage is returned (accuracy when present) | 88.6% | 89.0% | exa-instant |
| Funding fields returned (field coverage) | 93.6% | 89.0% | Exa |
| Companies resolved (resolution rate) | 100.0% | 100.0% | tie |
| Speed (median latency) | 12,848 ms | 1,507 ms | exa-instant |
| Cost (cohort, self-serve rates) (estimated cost) | $3.29 | $2.10 | exa-instant |
Contact data, intent, and integrations are not measured here — this is the company-funding slice only. Full leaderboard, methodology, and per-company evidence →
Exa vs exa-instant — common questions
Exa vs exa-instant: which has better funding data?
On measured correct stage yield (right latest funding stage across all companies with a verified reference), Exa leads: Exa 88.6% vs exa-instant 87.0%, judged against source-verified funding events on the same company cohort. On accuracy when a stage is returned, exa-instant leads (88.6% vs 89.0%).
Is Exa or exa-instant cheaper for funding data?
At public self-serve rates for the same benchmark run: Exa $3.29 vs exa-instant $2.10 — exa-instant is cheaper. Weigh cost against correct stage yield: a stale stage misroutes accounts, which costs more than the API call.
Which is faster, Exa or exa-instant?
Median request latency on the same run: Exa 12,848 ms vs exa-instant 1,507 ms — exa-instant is faster. Latency matters when funding enrichment runs inline in an agent or product flow; for batch scoring it usually doesn't.
Where does this comparison data come from?
The independent company-funding benchmark on this site: both providers received the same company domains, responses were normalized to one canonical funding-stage contract, and each returned stage was compared to a source-verified reference (company newsroom, wire announcement, or filing). No vendor pays for inclusion or rank; inputs, outputs, and evaluation code are public.