Parallel leads this measured workflow with P@100 67.5%.
Ranked by judged relevance in the top 100 returned companies.
BENCHMARK-BACKED WORKFLOW / 15
Generate a broad ranked account list from an ICP, then use the strongest measured long-list provider for the relevance depth your workflow needs.
For an ICP-based prospect list, describe the companies you want to find, generate a broad ranked set, and then filter the returned accounts with your own sales criteria.
[00] AGENT SUMMARY
Ranked by judged relevance in the top 100 returned companies.
Important limitation: The result applies to the published cohort, scoring policy, and snapshot—not every possible company or deployment.
How to choose: Use the leader for the displayed metric. Consider #2 or #3 when the linked benchmark shows a better cost, latency, coverage, or integration tradeoff for your constraints.
Implementation details: Endpoint, pricing, latency, methodology, and reproducibility notes live in the linked source benchmark.
Every step below maps to a source benchmark. The provider recommendation is evidence for that step, not a claim that one API owns the complete workflow.
Specify the companies, sectors, geography, and signals that matter.
Retrieve a ranked candidate set rather than hand-building it.
Add the firmographics needed for filtering and routing.
Apply your ICP rules and sales context to the enriched list.
[02] MEASURED EVIDENCE
Measures judged relevance among the top 100 returned companies for the same seed-company cohort.
OPEN SOURCE BENCHMARK →See the other company-list creation workflows and their available benchmark evidence.
OPEN WORKFLOW INDEX →