benchmarks/web-search/multi-turn company search/how to evaluate a web search API
45 questions · multi-hop · 20 configurations · updated 26 Sept 2026

How to evaluate a web search API for AI agents

What the benchmark found. Current output of the method: Parallel basic (parallel-basic) leads F1 at 46.5% across 20 configurations on 45 questions.

What this page compares. Vendor benchmarks test on their own samples with their own agent. This page states the method this benchmark uses so it can be reproduced, and shows the board it produces.

How to read it. Each step below is a decision the numbers depend on. The board at the bottom is the current output of the method.

Method in one paragraph. The same agent, prompt, turn budget and tool schema run against every web search API on 45 questions that each define a company set by three or four constraints. Every returned company is resolved to a canonical identity and compared with a human-reviewed gold set; precision, recall, F1 and exact-set are averaged over three runs per question. The model-only baseline is 0.

Most accurate · Fastest · Cheapest · Find companies by criteria · Search + fetch · Full benchmark

open runner + judgePublic in openbenchmarks-labs/multi-turn-company-search; dataset openbenchmarks/OB-Company-Websearch.github →

The method, step by step

Why hold the agent constant?

Because the question is which search API is better, not which agent. The same model, prompt, turn budget and tool schema run against every provider; only the search tool changes. Anything else confounds the comparison.

Why does the model-only baseline matter?

If the model can answer without search, the benchmark measures recall from training data, not the search API. Every question here combines three or four constraints; with no search tool at all, GPT-5.6-sol scores F1 20.1% on the private set.

Why report precision and recall, not just accuracy?

A company set can fail by including companies that do not meet every constraint (precision) or by omitting members (recall). An agent that pads and one that under-recalls need different fixes; F1 combines them and exact-set accuracy shows how often the set was perfect.

Why repeated runs?

Agent runs are stochastic. Three runs per provider per question, reported as mean and standard deviation, separate a provider's real level from a lucky run.

Ranked by F1, search-only

How to evaluate a web search API for AI agents: search-only
ProviderEndpoint & configurationF1PrecisionRecallExact setMedian timeMean turnsMedian task costAPI list price
Parallel basicPOST /v1/search mode=basicparallel-basic46.5 ± 1.988.7 ± 0.934.4 ± 2.03.7 ± 2.667.6 s7.4$1.120$0.070 search$1.050 token cost$0.005 / search
Exa deepPOST /search type=deepexa-deep45.4 ± 2.083.2 ± 3.033.7 ± 1.41.5 ± 1.389.5 s7.4$0.717$0.156 search$0.556 token cost$0.012 / search
Parallel advancedPOST /v1/search mode=advancedparallel-advanced44.2 ± 1.487.6 ± 3.432.0 ± 1.62.2 ± 0.083.4 s7.3$0.625$0.070 search$0.565 token cost$0.005 / search
Exa instantPOST /search type=instantexa-instant43.3 ± 1.082.6 ± 3.832.2 ± 0.53.0 ± 1.349.8 s7.3$0.652$0.091 search$0.559 token cost$0.007 / search
Linkup fastPOST /v1/search depth=fastlinkup-fast41.1 ± 1.782.8 ± 1.030.3 ± 1.50.7 ± 1.364.2 s7.4$0.923$0.070 search$0.853 token cost$0.005 / search
Tavily advancedPOST /search search_depth=advancedtavily-advanced41.1 ± 2.383.7 ± 4.229.8 ± 1.72.2 ± 0.092.2 s7.4$1.029$0.224 search$0.808 token cost$0.016 / search
Linkup standardPOST /v1/search depth=standardlinkup-standard40.6 ± 0.984.0 ± 7.929.7 ± 1.41.5 ± 2.672.3 s7.3$0.937$0.070 search$0.867 token cost$0.005 / search
YouPOST /v1/searchextraction_mode=highlights38.6 ± 0.879.3 ± 4.928.3 ± 0.94.4 ± 0.048.2 s7.5$0.971$0.070 search$0.901 token cost$0.005 / search
YouPOST /v1/searchextraction_mode=highlights · knowledge=core38.1 ± 0.680.9 ± 1.627.4 ± 0.93.0 ± 1.347.6 s7.5$0.895$0.070 search$0.827 token cost$0.005 / search
Parallel fastPOST /v1/search mode=fastparallel-fast38.0 ± 2.079.9 ± 4.627.5 ± 1.41.5 ± 1.353.9 s7.6$0.460$0.014 search$0.447 token cost$0.001 / search
PerplexityPOST /searchsearch_context_size=low37.8 ± 2.179.3 ± 5.726.8 ± 1.42.2 ± 2.248.9 s7.7$0.334$0.070 search$0.264 token cost$0.005 / search
Tavily basicPOST /search search_depth=basictavily-basic36.5 ± 3.282.5 ± 1.925.7 ± 2.71.5 ± 1.363.0 s7.7$0.615$0.112 search$0.504 token cost$0.008 / search
Parallel turboPOST /v1/search mode=turboparallel-turbo34.7 ± 2.480.0 ± 5.224.8 ± 2.41.5 ± 1.346.4 s7.6$0.419$0.014 search$0.405 token cost$0.001 / search
NimblePOST /v2/searchsearch_depth=standard · full_content=false · focus=general30.7 ± 1.470.3 ± 3.321.3 ± 1.10.7 ± 1.353.0 s7.7$0.467$0.070 search$0.398 token cost$0.005 / search
FirecrawlPOST /v2/searchfirecrawl30.4 ± 1.177.3 ± 4.420.7 ± 0.72.2 ± 0.075.0 s7.9$0.282$0.070 search$0.212 token cost$0.005 / search
Brave SearchGET /res/v1/web/searchbrave28.0 ± 1.766.9 ± 8.519.3 ± 0.50.7 ± 1.343.5 s8.0$0.268$0.070 search$0.200 token cost$0.005 / search
TinyFishGET api.search.tinyfish.aitinyfish26.6 ± 1.364.7 ± 1.517.9 ± 0.81.5 ± 1.364.2 s7.9$0.212$0.000 search$0.212 token cost$0 / search
NimblePOST /v2/searchsearch_depth=lite · full_content=false · focus=general25.3 ± 1.162.8 ± 1.917.6 ± 1.21.5 ± 1.367.9 s7.9$0.234$0.015 search$0.220 token cost$0.0011 / search
SeltzPOST /v1/search scope=companiesseltz-companies14.5 ± 0.940.0 ± 3.19.4 ± 0.70.0 ± 0.055.2 s7.3$1.751$0.070 search$1.681 token cost$0.005 / search
SERPGET google-search74.p.rapidapi.comserp0.4 ± 0.60.7 ± 1.30.3 ± 0.40.0 ± 0.031.4 s7.8$0.103$0.036 search$0.065 token cost$0.003 / search

F1, precision, recall, and exact-set accuracy are percentages reported as mean ± sample SD across three independent runs; each run aggregates all 45 questions. SD is measured in percentage points. Median time is the median end-to-end time across all runs for each vendor. Median task cost is the median of LLM $ plus search API $ per agent run. API list price is the PAYG unit rate of the search endpoint the harness calls.

Same sort, with a page-reading tool enabled

How to evaluate a web search API for AI agents: search + fetch
ProviderEndpoint & configurationF1PrecisionRecallExact setMedian timeMean turnsMedian task costAPI list price
Exa deepPOST /search type=deepexa-deep48.2 ± 2.189.4 ± 1.236.0 ± 2.22.2 ± 2.295.8 s7.5$0.683$0.156 search+fetch$0.526 token cost$0.012 / search$0.001 / fetch
PerplexityPOST /searchsearch_context_size=high46.6 ± 2.087.7 ± 5.934.7 ± 1.12.2 ± 2.253.9 s7.5$0.504$0.070 search+fetch$0.441 token cost$0.005 / search
Exa instantPOST /search type=instantexa-instant44.9 ± 0.985.9 ± 2.533.5 ± 0.95.2 ± 1.352.5 s7.5$0.653$0.091 search+fetch$0.557 token cost$0.007 / search$0.001 / fetch
Parallel basicPOST /v1/search mode=basicparallel-basic42.3 ± 1.181.3 ± 2.831.3 ± 1.13.0 ± 1.368.6 s7.5$1.089$0.061 search+fetch$1.033 token cost$0.005 / search$0.001 / fetch
Parallel advancedPOST /v1/search mode=advancedparallel-advanced42.2 ± 1.187.6 ± 0.330.1 ± 1.12.2 ± 0.080.9 s7.4$0.599$0.061 search+fetch$0.538 token cost$0.005 / search$0.001 / fetch
Linkup standardPOST /v1/search depth=standardlinkup-standard42.0 ± 1.890.7 ± 2.030.5 ± 2.03.0 ± 3.481.0 s7.5$0.911$0.070 search+fetch$0.848 token cost$0.005 / search$0.001 / fetch
Tavily advancedPOST /search search_depth=advancedtavily-advanced41.0 ± 1.389.4 ± 6.029.1 ± 0.72.2 ± 0.092.6 s7.3$0.898$0.195 search+fetch$0.685 token cost$0.016 / search$0.0032 / fetch
Linkup fastPOST /v1/search depth=fastlinkup-fast39.9 ± 1.385.3 ± 3.628.6 ± 1.30.7 ± 1.368.0 s7.3$0.903$0.061 search+fetch$0.837 token cost$0.005 / search$0.001 / fetch
Parallel fastPOST /v1/search mode=fastparallel-fast39.3 ± 3.382.3 ± 6.628.2 ± 2.02.2 ± 0.055.1 s7.6$0.441$0.014 search+fetch$0.427 token cost$0.001 / search$0.001 / fetch
YouPOST /v1/searchextraction_mode=highlights38.5 ± 1.685.2 ± 2.726.9 ± 1.70.7 ± 1.345.6 s7.4$0.864$0.065 search+fetch$0.795 token cost$0.005 / search$0.001 / fetch
YouPOST /v1/searchextraction_mode=highlights · knowledge=core38.5 ± 2.478.2 ± 2.528.3 ± 3.03.7 ± 1.348.5 s7.4$0.894$0.065 search+fetch$0.830 token cost$0.005 / search$0.001 / fetch
Tavily basicPOST /search search_depth=basictavily-basic38.1 ± 1.481.2 ± 5.927.8 ± 0.72.2 ± 0.062.0 s7.8$0.610$0.112 search+fetch$0.507 token cost$0.008 / search$0.0032 / fetch
Parallel turboPOST /v1/search mode=turboparallel-turbo36.0 ± 3.583.6 ± 4.025.0 ± 2.60.0 ± 0.048.1 s7.7$0.414$0.013 search+fetch$0.400 token cost$0.001 / search$0.001 / fetch
FirecrawlPOST /v2/searchfirecrawl33.2 ± 2.183.3 ± 0.822.7 ± 1.81.5 ± 1.382.1 s7.9$0.295$0.063 search+fetch$0.230 token cost$0.005 / search$0.0025 / fetch
NimblePOST /v2/searchsearch_depth=standard · full_content=false · focus=general · extract formats=[markdown]31.3 ± 1.873.2 ± 1.921.7 ± 1.61.5 ± 1.359.2 s7.9$0.424$0.424 token cost$0.005 / search
TinyFishGET api.search.tinyfish.aitinyfish30.2 ± 3.570.9 ± 11.320.9 ± 2.50.0 ± 0.063.4 s7.9$0.219$0.000 search+fetch$0.219 token cost$0 / search$0 / fetch
Brave SearchGET /res/v1/web/searchbrave29.4 ± 1.673.5 ± 5.820.4 ± 0.91.5 ± 1.345.1 s8.0$0.285$0.060 search+fetch$0.222 token cost$0.005 / search
NimblePOST /v2/searchsearch_depth=lite · full_content=false · focus=general · extract formats=[markdown]27.1 ± 1.568.5 ± 4.418.7 ± 0.92.2 ± 0.072.0 s8.0$0.237$0.237 token cost$0.0011 / search
SeltzPOST /v1/search scope=companiesseltz-companies16.3 ± 1.549.5 ± 2.410.2 ± 1.20.0 ± 0.060.1 s7.5$1.741$0.070 search+fetch$1.671 token cost$0.005 / search
SERPGET google-search74.p.rapidapi.comserp0.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.00.0 ± 0.033.4 s7.8$0.102$0.039 search+fetch$0.066 token cost$0.003 / search

F1, precision, recall, and exact-set accuracy are percentages reported as mean ± sample SD across three independent runs; each run aggregates all 45 questions. SD is measured in percentage points. Median time is the median end-to-end time across all runs for each vendor. Median task cost is the median of LLM $ plus search/fetch API $ per agent run. API list price is the PAYG unit rate of the search (and fetch) endpoint the harness calls.