A closed-won lookalike play turns the customers you've already won into a fresh target list — companies that look just like them. You take your won accounts as the seed, use a lookalike / similar-companies tool to pull companies that resemble them, and work that list through outbound and ABM. Whether it pays off comes down to one thing: how closely the tool's results actually match your winners. This is an independent benchmark of company lookalike / similar-companies APIs — Exa, Ocean.io, Parallel, PredictLeads, Extruct, CUFinder, and Discolike — ranked on how relevant the companies each one returns actually are, across 48 B2B seed companies.
[01] evidence
Benchmark evidence and per-seed audit trail
Same seed companies, same judge panel, Precision@10 and Precision@100 where each endpoint supports that depth — plus the per-seed matrix so you can inspect how each vendor behaved on each company.
long listPrecision@100: how relevant a vendor stays a hundred companies deep. The metric for lists that feed automated sequences. 3 vendors cannot appear here: their endpoint returns fewer than 100 results.
Long-list lookalike quality: aggregate Precision@100 by company lookalike API vendor
short listPrecision@10: how relevant the top of the list is. The metric that matters when a person works the results by hand and only the first few rows get touched. Every measured vendor appears here, and the only question asked of them is whether the companies are right.
Short-list lookalike quality: aggregate Precision@10 by company lookalike API vendor
audit viewcell = Precision@100; the small label shows P@10N/Avendor not yet run (or returned fewer than K results)click any scored cell to view the companies that vendor returned
Start with your winners.Pull your closed-won accounts from your CRM — they're the seed, your evidence of what a good-fit customer looks like.
Find their lookalikes. Feed the seeds to a lookalike tool and it returns companies that resemble them, ranked by similarity.
Work the list. Route those companies into outbound or ABM and lead with the closest matches.
The first and last moves are your usual motion. The middle one — the tool — is where results swing the most, so choose it from the measured evidence above rather than a demo.