Best employee headcount data API
Explorium has the highest measured employee-band correct-field yield: 88.9%, with 249/280 eligible company headcounts correct. The providers with the most complete headcount data and the fewest incorrect returned values may differ.
Eight company enrichment APIs received the same domain inputs. Exact employee counts and ranges were normalized and evaluated with a dedicated numeric policy. The benchmark separates correct yield, coverage, and accuracy when returned rather than treating every populated estimate as reliable workforce data.
Employee-count correctness, completeness, and writeback risk.
Correct-field yield is the primary ranking because it penalizes both missing and incorrect employee bands. Coverage measures whether an evaluable headcount was returned. Accuracy when returned measures how often a populated count or range passed the numeric policy.
| Provider | Correct-field yield | Field coverage | Accuracy when returned |
|---|---|---|---|
| Explorium | 88.9%249/280 correct | 95.0%266/280 returned | 93.6% |
| People Data Labs | 86.4%242/280 correct | 98.2%275/280 returned | 88.0% |
| Parallel | 80.7%226/280 correct | 94.3%264/280 returned | 85.6% |
| PredictLeads | 78.2%219/280 correct | 91.1%255/280 returned | 85.9% |
| Apollo | 78.2%219/280 correct | 95.4%267/280 returned | 82.0% |
| ZoomInfo | 47.9%134/280 correct | 94.6%265/280 returned | 50.6% |
| CompanyEnrich | 47.5%133/280 correct | 92.9%260/280 returned | 51.1% |
| Exa | 33.2%93/280 correct | 99.3%278/280 returned | 33.5% |
Compare headcount performance across every scored field.
This is the main benchmark's per-field table for HQ location, industry, employee band, founded year, and LinkedIn URL. Each value is correct-field yield against the eligible reviewed references for that attribute. Read the main benchmark methodology for the frozen cohort and public evidence.
| Provider | HQ location | Industry | Employee band | Founded year | LinkedIn URL |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apollo | 87.3%240/275 | 95.4%269/282 | 78.2%219/280 | 91.8%191/208 | 90.8%256/282 |
| CompanyEnrich | 50.9%140/275 | 74.8%211/282 | 47.5%133/280 | 90.4%188/208 | 91.1%257/282 |
| Exa | 82.9%228/275 | 96.1%271/282 | 33.2%93/280 | 97.6%203/208 | 5.3%15/282 |
| Explorium | 73.5%202/275 | 84.8%239/282 | 88.9%249/280 | 0.0%0/208 | 86.5%244/282 |
| Parallel | 90.9%250/275 | 92.9%262/282 | 80.7%226/280 | 76.4%159/208 | 86.2%243/282 |
| People Data Labs | 90.2%248/275 | 94.0%265/282 | 86.4%242/280 | 93.8%195/208 | 84.0%237/282 |
| Predict Leads | 68.4%188/275 | 88.3%249/282 | 78.2%219/280 | 89.9%187/208 | 84.8%239/282 |
| ZoomInfo | 73.1%201/275 | 74.5%210/282 | 47.9%134/280 | 61.4%129/210 | 62.4%176/282 |
What is the best API for employee headcount data?
Explorium has the highest measured end-to-end employee-band yield at 88.9% (249/280 eligible company headcounts correct). Coverage and accuracy when returned are reported separately because the best choice changes when missing data and wrong writebacks have different costs.
How is employee headcount accuracy judged?
The benchmark compares normalized numeric ranges and optional exact counts. It accepts matching bands, equivalent 1–10 and 2–10 bands, an exact count inside the reviewed range, a reviewed exact count inside the provider range, exact counts within 5%, and finite ranges whose bounds differ by at most one. Broad overlap alone does not pass.
How do I enrich a company list with employee headcount?
Send the same normalized company domain to each candidate provider, store both exact count and range when available, retain source date and entity scope, and evaluate missing and incorrect values separately. Decide first whether the workflow needs a segmentation band, a directional estimate, or payroll-grade current headcount.