---
title: "Best Company LinkedIn URL Finder API 2026 | Openbenchmarks"
description: "Best company LinkedIn URL finder API: domain to LinkedIn page accuracy, coverage and pricing across nine providers on 282 human-reviewed companies."
url: https://openbenchmarks.com/company-enrichment/best-company-linkedin-url-finder-api
---

[](https://openbenchmarks.com/) 

[Read the benchmark methodology →](https://openbenchmarks.com/company-enrichment#methodology) 

[benchmarks](https://openbenchmarks.com/) / [company enrichment](https://openbenchmarks.com/company-enrichment) / LinkedIn URL finder 

 company enrichment · LinkedIn URLs

# Best company LinkedIn URL finder API 2026

Nine APIs—People Data Labs, Apollo, Parallel, Predict Leads, Explorium, CompanyEnrich, ZoomInfo, Exa, and Seltz—receive the same company domain and enrich it by API calls from their official docs.

**CompanyEnrich** has the highest measured LinkedIn URL correct-field yield: **91.8%**, with 259/282 eligible company pages matched correctly.

Their LinkedIn company-page URLs were normalized and judged against human-reviewed Ground Truth. The table separates correct yield, coverage, and accuracy when returned.

eligible URLs

282 

providers

11 

field

1 

\[01\] measured LinkedIn URL results

## Company-page correctness, completeness, and match risk.

Correct-field yield is the primary ranking because it penalizes both missing and incorrect company pages. Coverage measures whether a URL was returned; accuracy when returned measures how often that URL was correct.

benchmarks/firmographic/by-attribute/linkedin-url live 

__Company enrichment providers ranked by correct LinkedIn company pages__
| Provider | Correct-field yield | Field coverage | Accuracy when returned |
| --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [CompanyEnrich](https://companyenrich.com "Open CompanyEnrich in a new tab") | **91.8%** 259/282 correct | 97.9% 276/282 returned | 93.8% |
| [Apollo](https://www.apollo.io "Open Apollo in a new tab") | **90.8%** 256/282 correct | 95.7% 270/282 returned | 94.8% |
| [Explorium](https://www.explorium.ai "Open Explorium in a new tab") | **86.5%** 244/282 correct | 95.0% 268/282 returned | 91.0% |
| [Parallel](https://parallel.ai "Open Parallel in a new tab") | **86.2%** 243/282 correct | 94.3% 266/282 returned | 91.3% |
| [PredictLeads](https://predictleads.com "Open PredictLeads in a new tab") | **84.8%** 239/282 correct | 91.5% 258/282 returned | 92.6% |
| [People Data Labs](https://www.peopledatalabs.com "Open People Data Labs in a new tab") | **84.0%** 237/282 correct | 98.2% 277/282 returned | 85.6% |
| [Nimble](https://www.nimbleway.com "Open Nimble in a new tab") | **82.3%** 232/282 correct | 86.5% 244/282 returned | 95.1% |
| [Nimble](https://www.nimbleway.com "Open Nimble in a new tab") | **63.1%** 178/282 correct | 65.6% 185/282 returned | 96.2% |
| [ZoomInfo](https://gtm.ai "Open ZoomInfo in a new tab") | **62.4%** 176/282 correct | 84.8% 239/282 returned | 73.6% |
| [Seltz](https://seltz.ai "Open Seltz in a new tab") | **35.5%** 100/282 correct | 36.9% 104/282 returned | 96.2% |
| [Exa](https://exa.ai "Open Exa in a new tab") | **5.3%** 15/282 correct | 5.3% 15/282 returned | 100.0% |

\[02\] all field results

## Compare LinkedIn URL performance across every scored field.

This is the main benchmark's per-field table for HQ location, industry, employee band, founded year, and LinkedIn URL. Each value is correct-field yield against the eligible reviewed references for that attribute. Read the [main benchmark methodology](https://openbenchmarks.com/company-enrichment#methodology) for the frozen cohort and public evidence.

benchmarks/firmographic/by-attribute all fields 

__Correct values per attribute, as a share of the companies carrying a verified reference for that attribute__
| Provider | Official docs | HQ location | Industry | Employee band | Founded year | LinkedIn URL |
| --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- | --- |
| [ Apollo ](https://www.apollo.io) | [Apollo official docs ↗ ](https://docs.apollo.io/reference/organization-search) | 87.3% 240/275 | 95.4% 269/282 | 78.2% 219/280 | 91.8% 191/208 | 90.8% 256/282 |
| [ CompanyEnrich ](https://companyenrich.com) | [CompanyEnrich official docs ↗ ](https://docs.companyenrich.com/reference/get%5Fcompanies-enrich) | 57.8% 159/275 | 75.9% 214/282 | 54.6% 153/280 | 90.0% 189/210 | **91.8%** 259/282 |
| [ Exa ](https://exa.ai) | [Exa official docs ↗ ](https://docs.exa.ai/reference/search) | 82.9% 228/275 | **96.1%** 271/282 | 33.2% 93/280 | **97.6%** 203/208 | 5.3% 15/282 |
| [ Explorium ](https://www.explorium.ai) | [Explorium official docs ↗ ](https://explorium-api.readme.io/reference/match%5Fbusinesses) | 73.5% 202/275 | 84.8% 239/282 | **88.9%** 249/280 | 0.0% 0/208 | 86.5% 244/282 |
| [ Nimble lite ](https://www.nimbleway.com) | [Nimble lite official docs ↗ ](https://docs.nimbleway.com/api-reference/search/search) | 52.0% 143/275 | 70.9% 200/282 | 44.3% 124/280 | 36.7% 77/210 | 63.1% 178/282 |
| [ Nimble standard ](https://www.nimbleway.com) | [Nimble standard official docs ↗ ](https://docs.nimbleway.com/api-reference/search/search) | 68.0% 187/275 | 85.8% 242/282 | 47.1% 132/280 | 63.3% 133/210 | 82.3% 232/282 |
| [ Parallel ](https://parallel.ai) | [Parallel official docs ↗ ](https://docs.parallel.ai/api-reference/responses-api/create-response) | **90.9%** 250/275 | 92.9% 262/282 | 80.7% 226/280 | 76.4% 159/208 | 86.2% 243/282 |
| [ People Data Labs ](https://www.peopledatalabs.com) | [People Data Labs official docs ↗ ](https://docs.peopledatalabs.com/docs/reference-company-enrichment-api) | 90.2% 248/275 | 94.0% 265/282 | 86.4% 242/280 | 93.8% 195/208 | 84.0% 237/282 |
| [ Predict Leads ](https://predictleads.com) | [Predict Leads official docs ↗ ](https://docs.predictleads.com/guide/extended%5Fcompanies%5Fdataset) | 68.4% 188/275 | 88.3% 249/282 | 78.2% 219/280 | 89.9% 187/208 | 84.8% 239/282 |
| [ Seltz ](https://seltz.ai) | [Seltz official docs ↗ ](https://docs.seltz.ai/api-reference/answer) | 35.6% 98/275 | 37.6% 106/282 | 7.9% 22/280 | 34.8% 73/210 | 35.5% 100/282 |
| [ ZoomInfo ](https://gtm.ai) | [ZoomInfo official docs ↗ ](https://gtm.ai/docs/mcp/tools/enrich-companies) | 73.1% 201/275 | 74.5% 210/282 | 47.9% 134/280 | 61.4% 129/210 | 62.4% 176/282 |

\[03\] questions

### How much does company LinkedIn URL lookup cost per record, and which API is cheapest?

At each provider's public entry self-serve rate, Nimble lite was the cheapest for the full 282-company run at $0.31, about $0.00 per company record. Pricing is for the whole enrichment call, not this field alone; no provider prices company LinkedIn URL lookup separately. Cheapest is not best: read cost beside this page's accuracy table.

### Which API is best for finding company LinkedIn URLs?

CompanyEnrich has the highest measured end-to-end LinkedIn URL yield at 91.8% (259/282 eligible company pages correct). Compare coverage and accuracy when returned separately if missing URLs and incorrect matches have different costs.

### What does this LinkedIn URL benchmark measure?

It measures whether a provider returns the reviewed LinkedIn company page for a company-domain input.

### How do I find LinkedIn company URLs from a list of domains?

Send the same normalized primary domain to each candidate provider, store the returned company-page URL, normalize URL variants, and measure missing and incorrect matches separately. Resolve redirects and alternate audited company-page URLs before treating a URL variation as a different identity.

open/benchmarks [company enrichment](https://openbenchmarks.com/company-enrichment) [methodology](https://openbenchmarks.com/company-enrichment#methodology) © 2026 Openbenchmarks